|
|||||||||
A Discussion of the Kalam Argument (1999)
The author argues that the existence of God cannot be deduced on the basis of the universe having a first cause. He points out that Craig has committed the fallacy of hasty generalization in his assumption that if all current naturalistic interpretations of a first cause fail, it follows that the first cause is supernatural.
|
[ e-mail the URL of this page ]
[top of page]
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Copyright© Internet Infidels® 1995-Present. All rights reserved.
|